Sunday, 29 May 2022

CREATIVE WRITERS AND DAYDREAMING SIGMUND FREUD--REVISED

                      CREATIVE WRITERS AND DAYDREAMING

SIGMUND FREUD

 

Sigmund Freud, recognized as the founder of psycho-analysis, is one of the seminal minds of the modern era. Most human mental activity, according to Freud, is unconscious. The primary source of psychic energy –LIBIDO—is sexual. Freud divides the human mind into three zones:

 

The three zones

 

1.      The ID--unconscious.

2.      The Ego—conscious personality

3.      The Super EGO—conscience.

 

·      Dreams and neurotic symptoms originate from the ID. The EGO and the super Ego repress them. Hence, they (dreams and neurotic symptoms) find expression in displaced forms.

[Comments: Displaced forms—art, literature etc. “One sheds one's sicknesses in books - repeats and presents again one's emotions, to be master of them”—D.H.Lawrence]

 

 In the essay, Freud applies the above model to creative writing. Literary imagination does not have a prominent place in the Freudian model. Many thinkers do not like Freud’s reductive attitude to art.

 

Influence of Freud

The Psychoanalytical theory of Freud has greatly influenced literature. Yet the relationship is reciprocal, and the effect of Freud upon literature is not greater than the effect of literature on Freud. When (on the occasion of the celebration of his seventieth birthday) someone greeted him as the discoverer of the unconscious, he corrected the speaker disclaiming the title: The poets and philosophers before me discovered the unconscious. What I discovered was the scientific method by which the unconscious can be studied. (Anecdote quoted from Lionel Trilling’s essay “Freud and Literature”).

 

Freud begins the essay by asking: “What is the source from which the creative writer draws his materials?

Ø For this, even the creative writer has no satisfactory reply. His attempt is always to lessen the distance between him and the ordinary people. He assures us that “every man is a poet at heart and that the last poet will not perish till the last man does”.

 

 

The Creative Writer and the Child

 

We can trace the first hints of imaginative (creative) activity in a child’s play.  The child behaves like a creative writer, forming a world of his own. 

He re-arranges the things of the world in a way that pleases him. He takes that world seriously and fills it with emotions, but he can distinguish that world from reality.

The child links the creative world to reality. That linking differentiates his ‘play’ from ‘fantasying’.

The creative writer does the same as a child at play. The writer creates a world of fantasy. He takes that world seriously and invests it with emotions—while separating it from reality.

 

Language has preserved this relationship between children’s play and poetic creation. The German language gives the name ‘spiel’ (play) to some forms of imaginative writing.

[ Lustspiel = pleasure play=comedy; Trauerspiel=mourning play=tragedy].

 

The unreality of the writer’s imaginative world has consequences for the technique of his art. Many things, unpleasant in reality, can be enjoyed in fantasy.

 

Adult Fantasies

 

As people grow up, they cease to play. Actually, we can never give up anything. We only exchange one thing for another. So instead of playing, he fantasies. He builds castles in the air and creates ‘day dreams’.

[Comments: The spider man to fight social injustice. ‘Anniyan’ ( a Tamil Film) to fight corruption in politics].

The child does not conceal his play. The adult, on the contrary, is ashamed of his fantasies and hides them from others. Motives differ in both.  The child's wish to be big and grown-up determines his play. But the adult cannot play but act in the real world. So, he conceals some of his wishes. He is ashamed of these wishes as being childish and impermissible.

 

Freud then analyses the characteristics of fantasying.

A happy person never fantasizes.

Fantasy is the fulfilment of a wish, a correction of unsatisfying reality. The motivating desires vary according to sex, character and circumstances.

1. Ambitious wishes—they elevate the personality. In young men, egoistic and ambitious wishes dominate alongside the erotic.

2.  Erotic wishes—in young women, these dominate and absorb the ambitious.

 

Fantasies are not stereotyped or unalterable.

"On the contrary, they fit themselves into the subject's shifting impressions of life, change with every change in his situation, and receive from every fresh active impression what might be called a 'datemark'." Past, present and future are strung together on the thread of the wish that runs through them.

 

To make this point clear, Freud gives us the example of the poor orphan boy who goes to a prospective employer. He has a daydream of getting the job and favour of his boss. In the dream, he marries the daughter (of the boss) and becomes a director of the business. Here, the wish uses an occasion to construct (based on the past) a picture of the future. If fantasies become over luxuriant, they may lead to neurosis or psychosis. 

     

 Freud then compares the creative writer with the daydreamer.

 

Freud takes only those writers who originate their material (and not those who take over ready-made materials—ancient authors of epics).

 The heroes in their stories are invulnerable.  

 In the heroes, we recognize His Majesty, the Ego, hero alike in every daydream and story. The women fall in love invariably with the hero.

In contrast to real life, characters are either good or bad. The good ones are the helpers. The bad ones are the enemies or rivals of the Ego.   

 

 

We know that many writings differ from the model of the naïve daydream. The psychological novel is an example. Here, only one person, the hero, is described from "within". The author sits inside the hero and looks at the other characters "from the outside". Here, we see the inclination of the modern writer "to split up his ego into many part-egos and personify the conflicting currents of mental life in several heroes".

 

In certain other types of novels, described as ‘eccentric’, the hero plays only a minor part. He sees the actions and sufferings of other people pass before him like a spectator. Many of Emily Zola’s later works fall into this category. Freud says that this divergence from the normal shows us “analogous variations of the day-dream”, in which “the ego contents itself with the role of the spectator”.

 

Creative writing and daydream

There is a strong connection between the writer and his works. A robust experience in the present awakens in the creative writer a memory of an earlier one, from which “proceeds a wish which finds its fulfilment in the creative work”. “The work itself exhibits elements of the recent provoking occasion as well as of the old memory”.

A piece of creative writing is like a daydream. It is a continuation of and a substitute for the play of childhood.

 

Art of creative writing

 

However, the daydreamer is ashamed of his fantasies. He conceals them. Even if he communicates them, it will give us no pleasure. Such “fantasies repel us and leave us cold”. But when a creative writer presents his daydreams, we experience great happiness. “The essential ‘ars poetica’ lies in the technique of overcoming the feeling of repulsion” (created by the barriers between “each single ego” and the others) in us.

The writer uses two techniques to overcome the "feeling of repulsion."

1. He softens the "character of his egoistic daydreams by altering and disguising it."

2. He "bribes" us by the aesthetic yield of pleasure offered in "the presentation of his fantasies".

·      We can call this “yield of pleasure” “forepleasure”. This “forepleasure” helps us make possible “the release of still greater pleasure arising from deeper psychical sources”.

·      Actual enjoyment of an imaginative work “proceeds from the liberation of tensions in our minds”. Thereby the writer enables us to enjoy our daydreams without self-reproach or shame.

 

Though critics and thinkers accuse Freud and his friends of a demeaning, reductive attitude to art, it is naïve to wish away the formative influence he wields in the development of modern literature.   

[1325 WORDS] 

Dr  S. SREEKUMAR


Disclaimer 

All the essays in this blog are for the undergraduate and postgraduate students of Indian Universities. They do not substitute the originals.  The students must necessarily go through the original texts. The writer hopes to help the students from the underdeveloped areas of our country.

END

 

1 comment: