Sunday, 11 December 2016

Literary Criticism--Middle Ages

M. Phil English, Bharathiar University--Blamiers--Approaches--Unit I

The Middle Ages
The Middle Ages
In the closing decades of the 4th century, Roman Empire came under repeated attacks by barbarian invaders like Goths, Huns and Vandals. Rome finally fell to Alaric, king of the Visigoths in 410 A.D.
The centuries between the fall of the Roman Empire and the Renaissance are called the Dark Ages. The Middle Ages [from 12th century to the Renaissance] constitute a part of the Dark Ages.


    The Dark Ages were not wholly dark. In between, there are visible patches of culture and civilization.  King Charlemagne’s rule [from 742 to 814 A.D.] is an example. In 800 A.D. the Pope himself crowned Charlemagne as the Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire.
    In England, the Dark Ages were marked by the arrival of the Anglo-Saxons who brought with them their own cultural practices. The rule of the Anglo-Saxon King Alfred was the golden period of Old English Literature. The great epic, Beowulf, belongs to the Old English period. 
    The spread of monasticism was one of the important developments of this period. Theological studies gained importance. Consequently, aesthetic theory was overshadowed by theological and philosophical scholarship. We can see only one or two thinkers exerting their influence on the formulation of aesthetic theories during the period.
1. Plotinus (205-270 A.D)
He lived in the period when the authority of the Roman Empire was drastically declining. His school of philosophy is known as ‘Neo-Platonism’. It expounded doctrines derived and developed from the philosophy of Plato.
·        Plotinus developed the distinctions between the world of appearance and reality.
·        His image of the nature of reality is “an expanding series of concentric cycles, each dependent on the one within it, and all produced by the spilling over of the eternal One”. This is a hierarchy of descending spheres of Reason, Soul, and Nature.
·        Men must discipline themselves to reach the spiritual world of Being and Unity. They should not follow Negation and Diversity.
His views on Art
Plotinus does not believe in the Platonic doctrine that art is twice removed from reality. He believed that the artist enjoyed a close participation in the Divine Reason. The artist is sensitive to the Beauty which the natural world reflects by imitation. He is also the one who fashions beauty, improving upon nature itself.
·        Plotinus compared an untreated block of stone and a finished work of sculpture. One is untouched by art and the other has been wrought by the artist into a beautiful statue.
·        Plotinus observes: “The form is not in the material; it is in the designer before it enters the stone”.
II. Augustine and Aquinas
a. Augustine (354-430)
St. Augustine was the representative of the historical development which pushed literary criticism out of the domain of intellectual life for several centuries.
Augustine wrote at a time when civilization was in a state of decay and collapse. The new Christian faith was at war with paganism. The old literature was tied with polytheism, with the discreditable doings of unrighteous gods. The wickedness of gods authorized human wickedness. The vices of gods gave the readers ‘imitable examples’. Pagan literature was sharply distinguished from Christian literature.
Augustine was not insensitive to the appeal of literature on human emotions. He was moved by Virgil’s description of the dead Dido. However, he believed that such emotions are misplaced. A man must weep at his own death for want of love to god. This belief allowed no room for the luxury of aesthetics. Everything became a moral or theological issue.
b. St. Thomas Aquinas (1224-74)
 Aquinas represents the intellectual development which made literary criticism possible again. He re-established what was valuable and relevant in the philosophy of Aristotle. Aquinas clearly demarcated the realm of reason and the realm of faith.
·        He placed the insights of pre-Christian philosophy in the realm of reason, and
·        the doctrines of Creation and Fall, Incarnation and Redemption in the realm of faith.
·        According to him there is no collision between the demands of reason and the primacy of faith.
·        He believed that there is a perfect interplay between revealed truth and the assumptions of reason.
Aquinas opened the door through which a flood of healthy rational speculation entered the realm of Christian doctrines. For him the beautiful was the object for contemplation without attachment. The beautiful is recognized and appreciated. The good is the object we desire.
However, aesthetic theories were something alien to Aquinas. He never considered ‘arts’ in the sense we use it. The word was used with a broader connotation which included fine arts as well as practical crafts.
III The Trivium
    The Medieval educational curriculum was based on the teaching of ‘Seven Liberal Arts’.
·        The seven were divided into the Trivium [Grammar, Dialectic & Rhetoric] and
·        The Quadrivium [Music, Arithmetic, Geometry, and Astronomy]
·        The Trivium was studied first and it was elementary.
The Trivium
a. Grammar
·        In the second century A.D, Apollonius Dyscolus of Alexandria had written a series of books on the parts of speech and syntax
·        One of the great authorities of Grammar in the Middle Ages was Aelius Donatus who wrote a commentary on Virgil. He also wrote Ars Minor which analyses qualities and defects of style. His work was widely used and the term ‘Donet’ came to be adopted for any instructive manual. Donatus’s work on Virgil exerted considerable influence on grammarians like Servius who wrote his own commentary on Virgil
·        The cult of Virgil as a great writer of unquestionable excellence was initiated by writers like Servius and Macrobius. Macrobius wrote a dialogue in seven books—Saturnalia.
From all these it becomes clear that Grammar covered a wider range of subjects than we generally attribute to the term. Grammar dealt with syntax, etymology, explanation of allusions or textual observations and inevitably entered the field of ‘literary criticism’.
b. Dialectic
This is concerned with the art of argument——how to make a point, how to prove a case, and how to disprove one. The basis of dialectic was Logic. The study of Logic, especially of what exactly connote or denote, involves enquiry into the nature of meaning and involves metaphysical speculation.
·        The standard medieval text book for Logic was Isagogue——an introduction to Aristotle by a third century scholar Porphyry (232-305).
C. Rhetoric
Only in the study of Grammar and Rhetoric we find the ancestry of literary criticism. Rhetoric was concerned with questions of structure and style, methods of presentation and devices of literary embellishment. But it was never concerned with the human interest in literature. Instead, it focused on objective artistry and sheer eloquence.
Dr. S. Sreekumar   


No comments:

Post a Comment