M. Phil English, Bharathiar
University--Blamiers--Approaches--Unit I
The
Middle Ages
BRITISH CRITICISM IN THE MIDDLE AGES
Summary by Dr. S. Sreekumar
Romans
left Britain at the beginning of the fifth century. Subsequent invasion by the
Angles and Saxons created two centuries of skirmishes, wars and other
uncertainties leaving little chance for any cultural flowering. We have to wait
till the 7th century to see the establishment of order and sanity in
civil life. In this century we see Ireland and England shining as the centres
of Latin culture. A Benedictine Abbey was founded in 674 at Wearmouth and books
were brought from Rome to the monastic library. One of the most celebrated of
English scholars, Bede, spent his time in the
cloisters. He was not only a Biblical scholar but also one very much interested
in history and science.
As for
literary criticism and critical theory there was very little in Bede’s writing
except one book——On
Figures and Tropes of Holy Writ. By figures Bede means variations in
word-order, and use of repetition. By ‘tropes’ he means figures of speech, such
as metaphor, synecdoche, and onomatopoeia, as well as devices such as irony and
sarcasm. Bede inaugurated a branch of study in England by applying critical
theory to the books of the Bible.
·
After Bede’s death, his pupil Egbert founded a school at York and taught theology
there.
·
Alcuin was
the disciple of Egbert and he tried to improve educational standards in
England.
·
Alcuin produced various text books——On Orthography, On Grammar and On Rhetoric.
·
In On
Rhetoric he is indebted to Cicero, who has defined the constituents of
rhetoric——inventio (the creative
faculty), disposito (form and
structure), elecutio ( diction and
style), memorio (memory), and pronuntatio (delivery). Alcuin
classified the five elements and treated them separately.
The Danish invasion interfered with the
continuous development of Anglo-Saxon literature. The invaders destroyed the
libraries. King Alfred did much to restore culture and learning from complete
destruction. He laid special emphasis on Latin scholarship and encouraged
translations. However, we see that in another two centuries English language
lost its prime importance in England. With the Norman conquest of 1066, Norman
French became the dominant language. English regained its status only by 14th
century. During the Norman rule, the noted literary figure in England was John
of Salisbury.
John of Salisbury
He was one of the finest Latin scholars
of the period. He was deeply read in Aristotle and he wrote Policraticus and Metalogicon.
·
Policraticus
lays
down a philosophy of government, and
·
Metalogicon
is
concerned with the study of logic.
John said much on the values of eloquence
and stressed the importance of Grammar and literature. He was much influenced
by Cicero, Horace, and Quintilian. His recommendation for good writing laid
stress on clarity, decorum, appropriateness, breadth of vocabulary, fluency and
restraint.
John was a lover of classics. He spoke
about the delight and consolation he obtained from them. He stressed the need
to interpret the Bible with attention to metaphorical and allegorical as well
as literal meanings.
Geoffrey de Vinsauf
He flourished about 1200. He produced a
systematic study of poetic rhetoric——Poetria
Nova —— which became a standard text book.
In Geoffrey de Vinsauf we get the
fullest expression of methods of presentation.
·
Descriptio —— a person or scene is
portrayed,
·
Exclamatio —— an emotional outburst is
directed at some person or thing,
·
Conformatio —— one endows objects or
abstractions with capacity to speak,
·
Expolitio —— saying the same thing in a
variety of different ways,
·
Circumlocutio —— contrast,
·
Similitudo —— comparison, and lastly
·
Diversio —— Digression.
Geoffrey tries to systematize methods
of stylish embellishment. In Ornatus, he
lists over sixty devices. Many of these are obvious devices, such as superlatio
(exaggeration) and translation (Metaphor). Some others are reduplications of
each other.
Geoffrey’s more general observations on
literature are conventional recommendations about appropriateness of style to matter,
consistency of style, restraint in the use of figurative devices, avoidance of strained
images, and excessive syntactical complexity.
Conclusion
The middle ages were not in any way remarkable
in the history of English criticism. We have to wait till the Renaissance to see
genuine progress in literary criticism.
Dr. S. Sreekumar
No comments:
Post a Comment