Bharathiar University MPhil (English) Study Materials -- PAPER II – APPROACHES TO LITERATURE
Unit V
Gayatri Chakravorti Spivak (Lodge & Wood, pp. 493 -509)
Feminism and Critical
Theory
Gayatri Chakravorty
Spivak
[This is a simplified
version of the original]
Dear Scholar,
In this blogspot, you get another detailed summary of the same essay. but as many students requested a simplified version of the same, I am publishing this summary. This summary will be more useful from the examination point of view.
Introduction
Gayatri Chakravorty
Spivak is the translator of Jacques
Derrida’s De la Grammatologie (Of
Grammatology) [notes -1]. She introduced deconstructive critical
strategies into cultural studies, especially feminism. [notes-2].
Deconstruction underlines the inherent capacity of the language to suggest
‘supplementary’ or excess semantic associations. [notes 3].
Spivak believed that deconstruction alone cannot remove sexist,
socio-cultural structures. We have to understand the existing antagonisms
between feminist, Marxist and deconstructive readings to realize the issues
related to the silenced Third World Women. Spivak’s perspective can be called
subaltern. This perspective highlights the fact that the politically
underprivileged sections are voiceless in any society. They are written out of
historical records. Their achievements are not considered important.
Spivak illustrates that an exclusively textual
approach towards understanding non-Western customs is bound to fail. These
would duplicate occidental ( x oriental) patterns of understanding. The subaltern subject has no space to speak. These
are some of the points highlighted in the essay, “Feminism and Critical Theory”
(In Other Worlds).
At the outset, Spivak summarizes
her essay thus:
1
The first section of the essay deals with a talk Spivak gave several
years ago.
2
The second section represents a
reflection on that earlier work.
3
The third section is an intermediate moment.
4
The fourth is the present moment.
Section 1
[The first section of the
essay deals with a talk Spivak gave several years ago.]
Spivak says that she cannot speak of feminism in general. She can only
speak about what she does as a woman in literary criticism. Her own definition of a woman is very simple.
That rests on the word ‘man’. Some may say that this is a reactionary (backward
looking) position. But this is the lesson she has
learned from deconstruction. No rigorous definition of anything is possible. If
one wants, one can go on deconstructing the binary opposition— man/woman— and
prove that it is an opposition that displaces itself.
Yet she feels that definitions are necessary in order to keep
us going to allow us to take a stand. Her present
definition of woman is not based on the ‘putative essence’ (accepted,
acknowledged) of woman but in terms of words currently in use. She fixes on the
word ‘man’ though she believes that no definition of anything is ever possible.
In many critical theories of the day [Lacan, Derrida, Foucault, Bathes],
the text is seen as an area of the discourse of human sciences. In other kinds
of discourses [like physics, mathematics, for example] there is an attempt to
find out the final truth. However, Literature shows that the truth of a human situation is that it is not
possible to find it. In the general field of Humanities there is a
search for solutions. But in literary discourse the playing out the problem is the solution.
The Problem of Human
Discourse
The
problem is in three shifting ‘concepts’—language, world, consciousness.
The world we know is organized as
a language
The consciousness with which we
operate is structured as a language
We are operated even by those
languages we do not possess.
The category we call the ‘world’ contains the categories of language and
consciousness. World itself is created by language and consciousness. When we
think about human control over the production of language, the word ‘writing’
is the most suitable figure.
In ‘writing’ there is the
absence of producer and receiver.
Thus ‘text’ is a safe figure. It is a weave of knowing
and not-knowing which is what knowing is.
Marx and Freud
Marx is a theorist of the world (history and society). He is read as a text
of the forces of labour and production-circulation-distribution.
Freud is a theorist of the self. He is read as a text of consciousness and
unconscious.
Spivak is not speaking of Marxist or psychoanalytic criticism as a
reductive enterprise which analyses every book in terms of Marxist or a
psychoanalytical canon. In her way of thinking the discourse of the literary
text is a general configuration of textuality. Here the solution is the unavailability of unified
solution to a unified, homogeneous consciousness. This unavailability is not faced but dodged.
The problem is apparently solved, in
terms of unifying concepts like ‘man’ or sex, race or class consciousness.
Marx’s use of use-value,
exchange-value and surplus value
Use- value is pertained to a thing as it is directly consumed by an agent. Exchange-value (money) is not related to direct use, but is
assessed in terms of what it can be exchanged for in either labour-power or
money. By making the worker work
longer than necessary for subsistence wages or by means of labour-saving
machinery, the buyer of the labourer’s work gets more (in exchange) than the worker needs for his
subsistence while he makes the thing. This ‘more worth’ is surplus-value.
Women, use, exchange and
surplus.
Woman in the traditional social
situation produces more than she needs for her subsistence. Thus she is a continual source of production
of surpluses for the man who owns her. The contemporary woman, when she seeks
financial compensation for housework, seeks to convert use-value into
exchange-value. The situation of the domestic workplace is not one of ‘pure
exchange’. Here some questions arise:--
What is the use-value of
unremunerated woman’s work for husband or family?
Is the willing entry into the wage
structure a curse or blessing?
How should women fight the idea,
universally accepted by men that wages are the only mark of value-producing
work?
What would be the implications of
denying women entry into the capitalist economy?
Though
these are important questions, they do not broaden Marxist theory from a
feminist point of view. For that the idea of externalization or alienation is
of more importance. [See notes 4]
Women and alienation
Within the capitalist system, the labour process/ product / worker are
commodities. The worker’s relationship to himself and his product are ruptured.
The woman is an agent in any theory
of production because she is in possession of a place of production in the
womb.
Marx’s dialectics of externalisation-alienation is inadequate to explain
the relationship between a woman and her child. This is because a fundamental
human relationship to a product and labour is not taken into account. In both
matrilineal and patrilineal societies the legal possession of the child is an
inalienable fact of the property right of the man who ‘produces the child’. The
man retains legal property rights over the product of a woman’s body.
Spivak says that women must engage and correct the theory of production
and alienation upon which the Marxist text is based and with which it
functions. Much Marxist feminism works on analogy of use-value, exchange-value,
and surplus-value relationships. If there
is a rewriting it would be harder to sketch out the rules of economy and social
ethics. In fact, deconstruction would question the definitions. In Marx one
would find a major transgression where rules for humanity and ethics are based
on inadequate evidence. Spivak suggests that if the nature and history of
alienation, labour, and the production of property are re-examined in terms of
women’s work and childbirth, it can lead us to a reading of Marx beyond Marx.
Feminist concepts
and Freud
a. Pain/pleasure binary
Freud considered pain as the deferment (postponement, suspension,
adjournment, delaying, putting off) of pleasure. [Beyond the Pleasure
Principle]. Spivak argues that in the womb, a place of production, there is the
possibility that pain exists within the concepts of normality and productivity.
[This is not to sentimentalize the pain of childbirth]. The opposition
pleasure/pain is questioned in the physiological ‘normality’ of woman.
If one were to look at the never-quite-defined concepts of normality and health
that run through and submerged in Freud’s texts, one would like to redefine the
nature of pain. Pain does not operate in the same way
in men and in women. Once again, Deconstruction will make it very hard
to devise the rules.
b. Penis Envy & Womb envy
Freud’s best-known determinant of femininity is penis-envy. In an essay
in the New Introductory Lectures,
Freud argues that the little girl is a little boy before she discovers sex. As
Luce Irigaray and others have shown, Freud does not take the womb into account.
Woman’s mood, since she carries the womb as well as carried by it, should be
corrective.
Women
must highlight womb-envy in the production of a theory of consciousness. [The
idea of the womb as a place of production is avoided both in Marx as in Freud].
c. Women and genital stage
In Freud, the genital stage is pre-eminently phallic, not clitoral or
vaginal. This particular gap in Freud is significant. Everywhere there is a
non-confrontation of the womb as a workshop.
Conclusion of Section I
Woman cannot ignore these ideas saying that criticism is neuter and
practical. Part of the feminist critical enterprise is to see that the great
male texts of Marx and Freud do not become adversaries or models from which
women take their ideas and revise or reassess.
These texts must be rewritten so that there is new material for the
grasping of the production and determination of literature. If women continue to work in this way, the
common currency of the understanding of society will change. This can
infiltrate the male academy and redo the terms of our understanding of the
context and substance of literature as part of the human enterprise.
Section II
The second section
represents a reflection of the First Section.
Spivak says that the dimension of race is
missing in her earlier remarks. She would prefer her work to be sensitive to gender, race and class.
The main problem in American feminist criticism is the identification of
racism with the racism in America. Therefore any study of Third World remains
constituted by the hegemonic First World intellectual practices.
Spivak’s concern with the production of
colonial discourse touches her critique of Freud as well as most Western
Feminist challenges to Freud.
First World response to Spivak’s analysis of
‘the discourse of the clitoris’.
American lesbian feminists welcomed the discourse of
the clitoris.
Spivak sees this position as resulting from giving too much stress on the
physiology. Spivak’s attempt to put First World Lesbianism in its place is not
because of pride in female heterosexuality. She would like to see the clitoris
as a short-hand for women’s excess in all areas of reproduction and practice,
an excess which must be brought under control.
Spivak’s attitude to
Marxism
Spivak recognizes the antagonism between Marxism and feminism. Hardcore Marxism at best dismisses and at
worst patronizes the importance of woman’s struggle. Spivak
feels that the ‘essential truth’ of Marxism or feminism cannot be separated
from their history.
Sexual reproduction and the
critique of wage-labour
If sexual reproduction is seen as the
production of a product by a determinate means (conjunction of
semination-ovulation) in a determinate fashion then two original Marxist
categories would be questioned—use value and surplus value.
The child is not a commodity. It has no
immediate use value. Direct exchange is not possible. These insights take the critique of
wage-labour into unexpected directions.
Wage theory and women’s
work
Women’s work has continuously survived within the varieties of capitalism
and in other historic and geographical modes of production.
With psychoanalytic feminism through an invocation of history and
politics, Spivak has come to psychoanalysis in colonialism.
From Marxist feminism, through an invocation of the economic text Spivak
has come to New Imperialism.
Spivak says that she is still
moved by the reversal-displacement morphology of deconstruction. The
deconstructive view keeps her resisting an essentialist freezing of the
concepts of gender, race, and class. Deconstruction will not allow the
establishment of a hegemonic ‘global theory’ of feminism.
Section III
The third section is an
intermediate moment.
This section of the essay is a re-reading of Margaret Drabble’s novel, The Waterfall. Drabble creates an
extreme situation in the novel. The main question here is, ‘Why does love
happen?’ Drabble situates her protagonist, Jane, in the utmost privacy, at the
moment of birthing, alone by choice. Lucy, her cousin and James, Lucy’s husband
are watching over her as she delivers a girl child. Jane looks and smells
dreadful. There is blood and sweat on the crumpled sheets and yet love happens
as James falls in love with her. It is
possible that Drabble is taking up the challenge of feminine ‘passivity’ as a
source of strength.
There are other views as well.
In her monologues Jane analyses the reasons for the love. Drabble considers the
problem of making women rivals in terms of the man who possesses them. But some
form of female bonding takes place because of the baby. Jane cannot deny the
pleasure she gets when she sees James holding the baby in his arms: “The man I
loved and the child whom I had given birth”.
The loose ending of the novel
makes it an extreme case. Is this love going to last bringing happiness to Jane
and James? At the melodramatic ending of the novel, Lucy understands everything
and everything is reduced to a humdrum (dull, boring, unexciting) kind of
double life.
Spivak says that the problem is that the entire questioning is going on
in a privileged atmosphere. Drabble considers the story of so privileged a
woman the most worth telling, a woman whose poems are read on the BBC. This enclosure is important. It is from there
that rules come. First World feminists are always doing it. If they need a
morality they will create one, a new virtue. They will invent morality that
condones them though by doing so they condemn all that they have been.
Conclusion
Drabble fills the void of the female
consciousness with meticulous and helpful articulation. But she does not give
any serious presentation of the problems of race and class, and of the
marginality of sex.
Drabble presents a micro structural dystopia (opposite of Utopia). It is a sexual
situation in extremes. This seems more and more a part of women’s fiction. Even
within those limitations, feminists’ motto cannot be Jane’s ‘I prefer to
suffer, I think’.
Section IV
The fourth is the present
moment.
Spivak says that essentialism is a trap. The feminist academia that
creates the discipline of women’s studies and the students who follow feminism
must remember that essentialism is a trap. All the world’s women do not relate
to the privileging of essence in the same way.
Spivak cites an incident that took
place in Seoul, South Korea in March 1982.
In a factory owned by Control Data, 237 female workers struck work
demanding better wages. Control Data is a Minnesota-based multinational
corporation. Six union leaders were
dismissed and imprisoned. The women took two visiting US Vice presidents as
hostages demanding the release of the arrested women. The Korean govt. was
reluctant. Control Data was willing. The Korean male workers at the factory ended
the dispute by beating up the female workers. Many women were injured and two
suffered miscarriages.
Spivak gives the narrative’s salient
points.
In earlier stages of industrial capitalism, the colonies provided the raw
materials so that the colonizing countries could develop their manufacturing
industrial base. Indigenous (native, local) production was crippled or
destroyed. To minimize circulation time, industrial capitalism needed to
establish due process. Hence such civilizing instruments as railways, postal
services, and a system of education were established.
The labour movements in the First World and the mechanisms of the welfare
state made manufacturing itself be carried out on the soil of the Third World,
where labour can make fewer demands, and the governments are mortgaged. In telecommunications industry where old
machinery becomes obsolete at a more rapid pace than it takes to absorb its
value in the commodity, this is particularly practical.
The workers in the Seoul factory were women. They are the true army of
surplus labour. No one, including their men, will agitate for an adequate wage.
In a two-job family, the man saves face if the woman makes less, even for a
comparable job.
However, socialized capital kills by remote control. The American
managers watched South Korean men decimating the women. The managers denied
charges. However active in the production of civilization as a by-product
socialized capital has not moved far from the presuppositions of a slave mode
of production. In Roman theory, the agricultural slave was instrumentum vocale.
One grade above instrumentum semi-vocale (livestock) and two grades above
instrumentum mutum (the agricultural implements)
PLATO
Control Data’s radio commercials speak of how its computers open the door
to knowledge, at home or in the workplace, for men and women alike. PLATO is
the acronym of Control Data’s computer system. PLATO reminds us of the Athenian
civilization which thrived on the slave mode of production. The intellectual heights
of the civilization were built in the silent depths of the city where the
slaves worked unceasingly.
Control Data is praised by bourgeois women as an enlightened corporation
that offer social-service leaves. One of the high paid women employee writes
thus: - “I commend Control Data for their commitment to employing and promoting
women”. Bourgeois feminism is blind to multinational theatre. It can see in
Control Data an extender of the Platonic mandate for women in general.
Feminism lives in the master-text as
well as in the pores [one of the very small holes in your skin that sweat can
pass through; one of the similar small holes in the surface of a plant or a
rock] .
Spivak
concludes—“I think less easily of ‘changing the world’ than in the past. I
teach a small number of the holders of the can(n)on, male or female, feminist
or masculist, how to read their own texts, as best as I can”.
Notes 1-Derrida’s
book is originally written in French which Spivak translated into English. The
translation had the approval of Derrida.
Notes 2—deconstruction emphasizes the fact
that binary differences are not ultimate. Binary differences like ‘good / evil, God / devil, man / woman’ can
be deconstructed. Take the example
‘God/devil’. We know that God created
Satan who was an archangel much liked by God till his rebellion. Since God created Satan there is an element
of God in Satan and vice versa. Deconstruction uses the term ‘trace’ to explain
this. Similarly, there is an element of man in woman and vice versa. Thus
binary differences are not ultimate.
Notes 3—simply look
at the multiple meanings of any word in the dictionary. Which meaning are you
going to select. Your selection of one meaning does not rule out the possibility
of other meanings. The word ‘cat’ is given here as an example.
cat \'kat\ n, often
attrib, [ME, fr. OE catt, prob. fr. LL cattus, catta cat] (bef. 12c)
1 a : a carnivorous
mammal (Felis catus) long domesticated as a pet and for catching rats and mice
b : any of a family (Felidae) of carnivorous usu. solitary and nocturnal
mammals (as the domestic cat, lion, tiger, leopard, jaguar, cougar, wildcat,
lynx, and cheetah)
2 : a malicious
woman, 3 : a strong tackle used to hoist
an anchor to the cathead of a ship, 4 a : catboat b : catamaran, 5 : cat-o'-nine-tails , 6 : catfish,
7 a player or devotee of jazz ,
8. cat vb, cat·ted cat·ting, to search for a sexual mate — often used with
around
To bring (an anchor)
up to the cathead, catalog, catalyst, cat·boat, cat–o'–nine–tails are other related words/expressions.
Any word we take up
from the dictionary will offer you supplementary meanings like the above one.
Deconstruction
exploits the capacity of the language to offer semantic supplementary.
Notes 4.
The worker’s alienation from the product of his labour under capitalism
is a particular case of alienation. The industrial worker in a modern car
factory does not have any relationship with the consumer of his product. There
is total alienation between him and his product.
[ this is a simplified version of the same essay published earlier in this blogspot. Please refer to the original for a detailed study].
Dr. S. Sreekumar
.
I’ve read some good stuff here. Definitely worth bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how much effort you put to create such a great informative website.
ReplyDeletePresident
this is a very good explanation for students.. thanks a lot for taking so much efforts
ReplyDeleteDetailed explanation.good work sir.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your good analysis
ReplyDeleteThis summary and all the explanations are brilliant. Your work is excellent... Thank you!!!
ReplyDeleteI LOVE you, Dr. S. Sreekumar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteThnk u soo much sir for sharing this.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete